Video thumbnail for 原来这就是RAG 一看就懂的AI检索机制

RAG Explained: Understand Retrieval Augmented Generation (AI)

Summary

Quick Abstract

Unlock the power of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) to enhance your AI applications! This summary explores how RAG addresses the problem of Large Language Model (LLM) hallucinations and inefficient processing of large documents. Learn how RAG uses embedding models and vector databases to retrieve relevant information.

  • RAG Overview: Combines information retrieval with text generation for more accurate and context-aware AI responses.

  • Embedding Models: Transforms text into fixed-length vectors, capturing semantic meaning for similarity comparisons.

  • Vector Databases: Stores and efficiently retrieves these vectors, enabling quick access to relevant document chunks.

  • Chunking Strategies: Divides documents into smaller, manageable segments for processing and indexing.

  • Limitations of RAG: Acknowledge some challenges around information lost with chunking and no 'global' perspective on documents.

Discover how RAG architecture works, including document preprocessing with "chunking," embedding creation, and using vector databases for efficient retrieval. Understand its current limitations and potential for future advancements!

Understanding Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)

This article explains Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), a technique used to enhance the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) by providing them with relevant context. It addresses the problem of "model hallucination" and limitations in processing large documents.

The Problem: Model Hallucination and Large Documents

LLMs can sometimes generate incorrect or nonsensical answers, a phenomenon known as "model hallucination," especially when they lack the necessary information. Simply providing the entire document to the LLM isn't always effective. Large documents can overwhelm the model, making it difficult to pinpoint the key information needed to answer the question accurately. The model can be easily sidetracked with too much information.

RAG: A Solution

RAG aims to address these issues by providing the LLM with only the most relevant parts of a document. Instead of sending the entire document, it retrieves and sends only the sections that are most pertinent to the user's question.

Embedding Models: Finding Relevance

To determine the relevance of text, RAG utilizes embedding models.

  • Unlike LLMs, embedding models output a fixed-length array (also known as a vector) for any given text input.

  • This array represents a compressed, lossy representation of the text's meaning.

  • The key idea is that texts with similar meanings will have vectors that are close to each other in a high-dimensional space.

Vector Space and Distance

Imagine a coordinate system where each dimension corresponds to a value in the vector output by the embedding model. Each piece of text is represented as a point in this space. Texts with similar meanings will be located closer to each other. The distance between the vectors of two pieces of text indicates their semantic similarity.

When a user asks a question, it is also converted into a vector using the same embedding model. The program then calculates the distance between the question's vector and the vectors of all the text fragments in the document. The text fragments with the smallest distances are considered the most relevant and are sent to the LLM along with the question.

RAG Architecture: A Step-by-Step Breakdown

Here's how RAG works:

  1. Document Chunking: The document is divided into smaller pieces or "chunks". This process can involve splitting by character count, paragraph, sentence or more sophisticated methods.
  2. Embedding: Each chunk is processed by an embedding model, generating a vector for each chunk.
  3. Vector Database Storage: The vectors and their corresponding text chunks are stored in a vector database. Vector databases are designed to efficiently find the vectors closest to a given query vector.
  4. Query Embedding: When a user asks a question, the question is also converted into a vector using the same embedding model.
  5. Retrieval: The vector database is queried with the question's vector, and the database retrieves the k nearest neighbor vectors (the vectors closest to the question's vector).
  6. Augmented Generation: The text chunks corresponding to the retrieved vectors are sent to the LLM along with the user's question. The LLM then generates an answer based on this context.

Limitations of RAG

While RAG improves LLM performance, it's not without limitations:

  • Chunking Challenges: Determining the optimal way to chunk a document is difficult, as different structures may require different methods. In some cases, key information may be split across chunks, leading to loss of context.

  • Lack of Global Perspective: RAG struggles with questions that require understanding the entire document rather than specific sections. For example, counting the occurrences of a word across the entire document may not be easily achieved using RAG, as each sentence might have equal, weak relevance.

Future Improvements

Ongoing research is focused on improving RAG, including more sophisticated chunking strategies and methods for incorporating a more global perspective. Some solutions involve using LLMs themselves in the chunking process to identify optimal split points, or uniformly replacing terms to provide more context.

RAG: A Useful Compromise

RAG represents a practical compromise, working within the limitations of current LLMs to provide more accurate and relevant responses. While it's not a perfect solution, it addresses key challenges and helps to mitigate the risk of model hallucination, pending future architectures that transcend these compromises. RAG is a form of compression that filters for the most important components of a document.

Was this summary helpful?