This article compares Make.com and n8n, two popular tools for creating AI automations. Both platforms have their own set of advantages and disadvantages, which will be explored in detail.
Introduction to Make.com and n8n
Make.com and n8n are used to build automated workflows, particularly those involving AI. This comparison will help you understand which tool might be better suited for your specific needs. A free consultation service is available to help businesses determine which automations can streamline their operations.
Workflow Structure: Linear vs. Complex
Make.com: Linear Workflows
Make.com primarily offers linear workflows, although branching is possible. A typical workflow involves a series of steps executed in a defined order.
n8n: Complex Workflows
n8n supports more complex workflows. It allows for branching, merging, and even looping, providing greater flexibility. This makes n8n more powerful for intricate automation scenarios.
Agentic Systems: AI Agent Capabilities
Make.com: Limited AI Agent Functionality
While Make.com has AI modules, they generally operate unidirectionally, providing a single text result. It's more of a workflow tool rather than a dedicated AI agent platform.
n8n: Advanced AI Agent Capabilities
n8n facilitates agentic workflows, enabling the use of various tools and Large Language Models (LLMs). An agent can use an LLM to determine which tools to use (e.g., Google Calendar, Telegram) based on input, making more complex decisions. This is more useful when building AI agents.
Hosting Options: Cloud vs. Local
Make.com: Cloud Hosting Only
Make.com only offers cloud hosting.
n8n: Cloud and Local Hosting
n8n provides both cloud and local hosting options. Local hosting allows you to download the library and run n8n on your own machine or host it on a private network, enhancing security.
Pricing Structure: Operations vs. Executions
Make.com: Charged per Operation
Make.com charges based on the number of operations performed. An operation refers to the execution of a single module within a workflow.
n8n: Charged per Execution (Cloud)
n8n's cloud version charges based on the number of executions. An execution represents the complete run of an entire workflow. Local hosting is free.
Operations vs. Executions Explained
In a workflow with a Google Form, a ChatGPT module, and a Telegram message, each module running is one operation. The whole workflow running end to end is one execution. For complex workflows, n8n can be more cost-effective due to its execution-based pricing model.
Costing and Free Plans
Make.com: Free Plan Available
Make.com offers a free plan with a limited number of operations per month (1,000). Paid plans offer more operations and features.
n8n: No Free Cloud Plan
n8n does not have a free cloud plan. It offers paid startup and pro plans. However, running n8n locally is free.
Pros and Cons
Make.com
-
Pros:
-
Beginner-friendly interface
-
Good UI
-
Wide range of integrated apps
-
Unlimited active workflows
-
Good for simple workflows
-
-
Cons:
-
Can be expensive (operation-based pricing)
-
Limited AI agent building capabilities
-
n8n
-
Pros:
-
Local hosting option
-
Suitable for complex workflows
-
Supports AI agent development
-
Ability to add custom code
-
-
Cons:
-
More complex to use
-
Fewer pre-built modules
-
Conclusion
Choosing between Make.com and n8n depends on your specific needs. Make.com is suitable for beginners and simple workflows, while n8n is better for complex automations and AI agent development. Consider your budget, technical expertise, and desired level of customization when making your decision. Free consultation is available for further assistance.