Discussion on Fairness, Discrimination, and College Admissions
This article summarizes a discussion regarding fairness, discrimination, and college admissions policies, particularly concerning Asian students. The conversation touches upon the role of standardized tests and the application of holistic admissions practices.
The State of Racism in the United States
A key point raised was the assertion that the United States is one of the "most fair, most equitable, least racist societies" in the world. The progress made in the last 250 years was highlighted, but it was acknowledged that perfection hasn't been achieved.
DEI and Discrimination
The discussion addressed concerns about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The argument was made that sometimes DEI efforts can result in “pernicious discrimination based on race,” even if presented under a "sanitary condition" like DEI.
Discrimination Against Asian Students
The issue of discrimination against Asian students in college admissions was directly addressed.
-
The question was posed: Is it fair to discriminate against Asian students?
-
Specifically, is it fair to admit a student of a different ethnicity over a more qualified Asian student with better test scores? The response given was a "categorical no."
Holistic Admissions and the Role of Standardized Tests
The debate explored the definition of "more qualified" and the reliance on standardized tests. It was emphasized that research suggests holistic admissions consider factors beyond test scores and GPA. The Supreme Court decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard was mentioned.
-
The value and fairness of standardized tests were questioned.
-
Whether the tests correlate well with student performance, grades, and graduation rates was also discussed.
The statement that the evidence regarding the predictive power of standardized tests is "mixed" was noted. It was questioned whether someone with a perfect ACT score is statistically more likely to graduate.
Perspectives on Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard
A professor from the University of Southern California (USC) was questioned about USC's compliance with the Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard decision.
-
The professor clarified that they were representing themself and not acting as a spokesperson for USC.
-
The professor emphasized basing remarks on 50 years of research, not personal opinions.
The Dream of Martin Luther King Jr.
The famous "I have a dream" quote by Martin Luther King Jr. was invoked, specifically the passage about judging individuals by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. The professor agreed with this sentiment. It was stated that Martin Luther King Jr. was "staunchly opposed to racism, poverty, and discrimination."
The question was raised whether discriminating against Asian students with high grades and test scores constitutes discrimination.