Saying Goodbye to the Apple Vision Pro: A Detailed Rationale
The Apple Vision Pro is being returned. It was a difficult decision, but a combination of factors led to this conclusion. While the device is undeniably impressive, its current value proposition doesn't justify the high cost for the speaker's specific needs and usage patterns.
Appreciation for the Technology
The Apple Vision Pro is recognized as an incredible piece of technology, unlike anything else currently available. Its seamless integration with the Apple ecosystem, including Mac, iPhone, and iCloud, sets it apart. The core technology, which allows intuitive interaction with a computer strapped to one's face, is truly mind-blowing.
Disputing Weight Concerns
Contrary to some opinions, the weight of the Vision Pro was not an issue for the speaker, even during extended use of around five hours. Concerns about the solo band causing neck pain were dismissed as simply weakness.
The App Development Dilemma
Building Apps Without the Device
The primary reason for purchasing the Vision Pro was to develop applications for it. However, the realization that the Xcode simulator allows for app development without the physical device significantly altered the equation.
Real-World Testing vs. Current Priorities
While testing on the actual device is essential for final production versions, the speaker admits that building Vision Pro apps is not a current priority. Current projects, like perfectinterview.ai, are web applications, and there are no immediate plans to develop a Vision Pro version. The speaker felt that purchasing one now was jumping the gun, especially since getting one in the future would be fairly easy.
Day-to-Day Use Cases and Limitations
The Coding Constraint
As a developer, the speaker's primary computer use is coding. The Vision Pro's inability to function as a standalone coding device is a major drawback. It can only be used in conjunction with a MacBook, and the benefits of mirroring a Mac display do not justify the $3,500 (or closer to $4,000 after tax) price tag.
Productivity Concerns
While the mirroring functionality is impressive, it doesn't provide a significant boost in productivity. The speaker felt that it wasn't worth it to pay $4,000 for an accessory that doesn't enhance coding workflow.
Forcing the Fit
The Exercise Bike Analogy
Unlike the Vision Pro, the speaker feels immediate value from their exercise bike, which is similarly priced. The bike seamlessly integrates into their existing workout routine, whereas the Vision Pro felt forced into their daily life. The speaker uses their bike four to five times a week, and does not have buyers remorse.
A $3,500 Accessory
The Vision Pro felt more like an expensive accessory to a MacBook Pro, which is hard to justify. If the device could function as a complete replacement for a laptop, with the ability to code directly on it, the decision to keep it would be different.
Smaller Annoyances
Contact Lens Issues
Several smaller issues also contributed to the return decision. Contact lens wearers may experience significant eye dryness due to reduced blinking while using the Vision Pro. Purchasing optical inserts would increase the cost of ownership, which the speaker was not in favor of.
Eye Tracking Inconsistencies
The eye-tracking, while generally good, struggles with smaller details, such as tiny buttons on websites. This makes navigating certain elements frustrating.
Not a Negative Outlook, Just Not Yet
Future Potential
Despite returning the device, the speaker is not bearish on the Vision Pro's future success. The current price point doesn't justify the value it provides for the speaker, but this may change as their needs change.
A Temporary Goodbye
The decision to return the Vision Pro felt like a breakup. While sad to part ways with a piece of technological history, the speaker acknowledges that it's not the right fit for them at this time and is hopeful to reconnect with it in the future.