Video thumbnail for 台灣日常  『 只要我不認錯我就沒有錯 』

Taiwanese Culture: Why Apologizing is So Hard (East vs. West)

Summary

Quick Abstract

Explore the intriguing perspective on Taiwanese culture where admitting mistakes seems like a monumental hurdle. This video delves into observations on how Taiwanese society often avoids accountability, contrasting it with Western approaches to error and communication. Discover the cultural nuances surrounding apologies and the perceived protection of wrongdoers.

Quick Takeaways:

  • Taiwanese society often avoids admitting errors, creating a unique dynamic.

  • Public figures face pressure to be flawless, hindering genuine apologies.

  • Eastern and Western perspectives on fault differ significantly, influencing communication.

  • The legal system is viewed by some as protecting wrongdoers, impacting justice perception.

  • Overcoming the reluctance to admit mistakes can foster healthier communication and personal growth.

The discussion extends to the pressure to appear perfect, the influence of Eastern vs. Western ideologies, and how our education system impacts our capacity for critical thinking. Finally, we hear about the positive impact of adopting a more open-minded, humble approach to life and the positive effect it can have on improving communication.

Taiwan's Cultural Nuances: Apologies, Mistakes, and Eastern vs. Western Thinking

This article explores observations about cultural differences, particularly in Taiwan, regarding admitting mistakes, taking responsibility, and the influence of Eastern and Western philosophies.

A Real-Life Mishap and its Implications

The speaker recounts an incident involving his wife's packages being sent to the wrong locations due to a mix-up at the management room. The unexpected consequences and reactions highlighted a broader cultural issue. Despite the clear error, the security company displayed a defensive attitude, emphasizing that they weren't at fault. This incident sparked a realization: in Taiwan, a simple apology often isn't enough to resolve issues stemming from larger problems.

The Reluctance to Admit Mistakes

The speaker observes a tendency in Taiwan to avoid admitting fault, even when it's evident. He cites examples of public figures evading responsibility and compares it to the straightforward approach of acknowledging errors and apologizing. This behavior is prevalent across various segments of society, from teachers and politicians to everyday interactions like driving. People tend to prioritize winning an argument over acknowledging their mistakes. The speaker believes that this atmosphere is even protected by the law, and that the bad person is the one who is protected.

Eastern vs. Western Philosophies on Imperfection

The article shifts to a discussion about the difference between Eastern and Western views on perfection and imperfection. Eastern philosophies and deities often emphasize flawlessness and adherence to principles. In contrast, Western mythologies portray gods with numerous flaws and imperfections. The speaker suggests that Eastern culture often expects individuals to present themselves as perfect, complete, and without shortcomings. Whereas in the West it's more okay to have imperfection. He advocates for embracing the idea that people are normal and will make mistakes, and even have bad thoughts. He argues this honest way of thinking is the fundamental difference between the two sides.

The Impact on Communication and Discussion

The speaker contends that this reluctance to admit mistakes significantly hinders communication and open discussion, especially in Taiwan. Taiwanese people struggle with being criticized, resulting in defensiveness and anger when confronted with their errors. This contrasts with a Western approach, where open discussion and the acknowledgement of differing opinions are encouraged. In Western cultures, the process of speaking freely is encouraged even if you're wrong.

Hierarchical Thinking and its Limitations

Eastern hierarchical thinking also plays a role. The speaker touches on the concept of seniority and authority, where those in higher positions are often perceived as being inherently right. This can stifle critical thinking and discourage the challenging of established ideas. He uses the example of language, where being called a "grandson" implies inferiority. Also, the east focuses on backround rather than morality.

The Value of Open-Mindedness and Continuous Learning

The speaker stresses the importance of maintaining an open mind and being willing to reconsider one's own beliefs. He references the concept of "thinking outside the box," and encourages self-reflection and the possibility that past ideas may have been incorrect. He encourages people to be more open-minded when they face results, and to admit mistakes. He emphasizes that holding onto rigid beliefs can limit personal growth and understanding.

Encouraging Humility and Reflection

In conclusion, the speaker emphasizes the value of humility and reflection in social interactions. He suggests that acknowledging the possibility of being wrong, even in conversations with friends and family, can lead to more meaningful and productive discussions. He encourages individuals to adopt a more open-minded approach, recognizing that there's always room for growth and learning. People should embrace speaking out even if it goes against the normal thought process.

Was this summary helpful?

Quick Actions

Watch on YouTube

Summarize a New YouTube Video

Enter a YouTube video URL below to get a quick summary and key takeaways.