The Rise of Quiet Downsizing in Big Tech: Voluntary Buyouts and AI
The tech industry is undergoing a significant transformation in how it manages its workforce, marked by a shift towards "quiet downsizing." This approach prioritizes discretion and cost certainty through voluntary buyout programs, masking the true scale of restructuring and distorting labor data. This trend is driven by both the need for cost discipline and the impact of AI on workforce needs.
The Shift to Voluntary Buyouts
Over the past three years, tech companies have experimented with various methods to reduce headcount, including mass layoffs, hiring freezes, and performance improvement plans. However, a new balance is emerging, with companies increasingly favoring voluntary exit packages. These packages offer employees a severance in exchange for a quiet departure, allowing companies to reduce staff without the negative publicity associated with mass layoffs.
Google, under Alphabet, is a prime example of this shift. After eliminating 12,000 positions in 2023, Google transitioned to a voluntary exit program that offers generous severance packages to employees deemed "misaligned" with the company's new AI-focused roadmap. Competitors like Microsoft, Amazon, SAP, and Verizon have adopted similar strategies.
The Scale and Impact of Quiet Restructuring
While the method of reducing headcount has changed, the scale remains substantial. By mid-May 2025, at least 61,000 jobs had been eliminated by 130 tech companies. These departures are often disguised with euphemisms like "talent mobility" or "workforce realignment," making it difficult to accurately assess the true extent of the restructuring. Because voluntary buyouts are counted as resignations by the US Department of Labor, official layoff figures are distorted, masking the true magnitude of restructuring.
Economists estimate that up to one-third of voluntary resignations in Silicon Valley in 2025 are driven by buyout offers, a significant increase compared to pre-pandemic levels.
Google's Buyout Strategy
Google's buyout program has expanded to include employees across several divisions, even its core search and advertising units. The company presents the program as a support measure for those not fully aligned with its strategy. Those who accept a buyout are statistically less productive under the new AI-centric approach and that the cost of these severance packages is lower than keeping misaligned employees on payroll.
The company's rationale is simple: those who accept a buyout are statistically less productive under the new AI-centric approach. Moreover, the cost of these severance packages is lower than keeping misaligned employees on payroll for months or even years.
Examples from Other Companies
Other companies have implemented similar strategies:
-
Nissan: Offering buyouts to US workers and suspending merit-based global pay raises.
-
Microsoft: Offers 16 weeks of salary to low-performing employees who voluntarily resign.
-
Amazon: Pioneered the model with packages of three months' salary, especially for employees resisting return-to-office mandates.
Google has replicated both elements: an attractive payout and pressure to be in the office at least three days a week or take the offer.
The Costs and Benefits of Voluntary Exits
Voluntary exits are not inexpensive. If 10% of Alphabet's employees accepted it, the estimated cash severance expense would exceed $550 million. However, these sums may prove more cost-effective than the indirect costs of forced dismissals, such as wrongful termination lawsuits and reputational damage. Voluntary exits usually include agreements that prevent future litigation.
Implications and Future Trends
The rise in voluntary exits is distorting official employment indicators. For experienced workers, a buyout package can serve as a bridge to new opportunities, providing financial support during a job search. However, younger employees with less tenure may face challenges in a saturated job market.
Investors generally reward companies that demonstrate disciplined optimization. Tech leaders argue that severance packages free up budget to hire AI talent. Alphabet plans to redirect $500 million in payroll savings toward custom AI accelerators. Voluntary exits make that talent swap possible, but they are not risk-free. Some high-performing employees may take the offers to launch startups, taking strategic knowledge with them.
California lawmakers are proposing more transparency requirements for these programs, which could reduce their reputational benefits.
The future of the tech job market depends on the speed of AI adoption and the availability of qualified talent. If AI continues to automate mid-level functions, companies will likely continue to use agile mechanisms to reconfigure their workforces. However, if technical talent becomes scarce, incentives may shift, and retention packages could replace buyout offers.