Video thumbnail for 画饼十几年,永远在跳票,固态电池为何总是“下次一定”?【柴知道】

Solid-State Batteries: Why Are They Always Delayed? The Truth!

Summary

Quick Abstract

Is the solid-state battery revolution just around the corner, or are we stuck in "next year" forever? This summary dives into the promises of safer, more energy-dense batteries and why their arrival keeps getting delayed. We explore the technical hurdles, material challenges (polymers, oxides, sulfides), and the perspectives of industry giants like Toyota and CATL.

  • Safety First: Solid-state aims to replace flammable liquid electrolytes.

  • Energy Boost: Potentially doubling energy density (800-1000Wh/L).

  • Material Roadblocks: Polymers failed; oxides face interface resistance; sulfides struggle with safety and cost.

  • Toyota's Saga: A long history of delayed solid-state battery launch dates.

  • CATL's Caution: Mass production and cost parity with lithium-ion are still distant goals (2030+).

  • The "Half-Solid" Compromise: Some companies using small amounts of liquid electrolyte to achieve some goals.

The quest continues! Will 2026 or 2027 finally be the year, or will we be waiting until 2030 and beyond? Optimism remains, but tempered expectations are key.

The Elusive Solid-State Battery: Always "Next Year's Technology"?

The automotive industry, especially the electric vehicle (EV) sector, has long anticipated the arrival of solid-state batteries. Touted for their potential safety and energy density advantages, they have become a perennial topic of discussion. However, the promise of a "solid-state battery era" seems to be constantly delayed, with initial predictions of 2025 now pushed back to 2026 or even 2027. This begs the question: what makes solid-state batteries so desirable, and why are they always just out of reach?

The Appeal of Solid-State Batteries: Safety and Energy Density

The primary allure of solid-state batteries lies in their promise of enhanced safety. Current lithium-ion batteries utilize a liquid electrolyte, which is flammable and can contribute to battery fires and explosions. Solid-state batteries aim to replace this liquid electrolyte with a solid material, thus mitigating the risk of thermal runaway.

Furthermore, solid-state batteries are projected to offer significantly higher energy density, potentially reaching 800-1000 Wh/L. This is nearly double the energy density of existing lithium-ion and lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries. This improvement would translate to longer driving ranges and smaller, lighter battery packs for EVs.

The Challenge: Finding the Right Solid Electrolyte

The core challenge in developing solid-state batteries is finding a suitable solid electrolyte material. Traditional understanding dictates that electrolytes need to be in a liquid or molten state to effectively conduct ions. Therefore, creating a solid electrolyte that can match the conductivity of liquid electrolytes requires innovative material science. Several materials are being explored, including:

  • Polymers: While tried, polymer-based solid-state batteries have proven inadequate due to their low ionic conductivity at room temperature.

  • Oxides: Oxides offer better conductivity than polymers and are already used in "semi-solid-state" batteries, but they present challenges with "interface resistance".

  • Sulfides: Sulfides boast excellent ionic conductivity, rivaling liquid electrolytes. However, they suffer from safety concerns due to their instability and tendency to release toxic and flammable hydrogen sulfide gas upon exposure to air.

The Interface Resistance Problem

A significant hurdle in solid-state battery development is the "interface resistance" between the solid electrolyte and the electrodes. In liquid electrolyte batteries, the electrodes are fully wetted by the electrolyte, ensuring good ionic contact. However, solid-solid interfaces have limited contact area, resulting in higher resistance to ion flow.

Some companies are using a small amount of liquid electrolyte in conjunction with oxide solid electrolytes in what is referred to as semi-solid state battery to reduce this interface resistance.

The State of the Race: Which Technology Will Prevail?

The race to develop commercially viable solid-state batteries is intense, with various players pursuing different technological approaches.

  • Oxide-based batteries: Some companies are aiming to launch oxide-based solid-state batteries within the next few years, albeit with compromises like the addition of liquid electrolytes to address interface resistance.

  • Sulfide-based batteries: Major players like CATL, BYD, Toyota, and Samsung are heavily invested in sulfide-based solid-state batteries. While offering superior conductivity, they face significant challenges related to safety and production costs.

  • Alternative Materials: Beyond these mainstream options, researchers are also exploring halide and composite electrolytes.

The Persistent Delays: A Word of Caution

Despite optimistic projections from various companies, experts remain cautious about the timeline for mass production of solid-state batteries. Zeng Yuqun, the head of CATL, has stated that they are unsure whether solid-state batteries can reach mass production by 2027 and anticipates significant adoption after 2030. The road to solid-state batteries is still long, and significant technological hurdles remain.

Was this summary helpful?