The Kashmir Conflict: A Historical and Contemporary Analysis
The 2025 Terrorist Attack in Kashmir
In April 2025, a peaceful tourist town in Kashmir turned into a nightmare. A group of armed terrorists stopped travelers and began asking one terrifying question: "Are you Hindu or Muslim?" If the answer didn't match, they opened fire. 26 innocent tourists were killed, and one woman lost her husband right in front of her eyes. This attack is a stark reminder of the ongoing conflict in Kashmir and the devastating impact it has on civilians.
The Difference Between War and Terrorism
One of the big differences between a war and terrorism is that terrorists actively target civilians and kill them specifically. They don't go in trying to attack a military base and civilians get killed in the process. They don't bomb a place where there are a military area and there's casualties of like collateral damage. These people actively target civilians.
The Aftermath of the Attack
Since that moment, India's people are furious. The army is on alert, and Pakistan is getting nervous. But why would Pakistan be nervous? Shouldn't Pakistan use their own military to find out where these insurgency terrorist groups are and get rid of them themselves? Because if they have a terrorist group in their country, isn't that a problem for Pakistan? And if that's not a problem for Pakistan, then that sounds like Pakistan is a problem.
The History of the Kashmir Conflict
The Kashmir conflict dates back to the time of independence in 1947, when British India was divided into two separate nations: India, which had a Hindu majority population, and Pakistan, created as a homeland for Muslims. But the split wasn't as clean as drawing a line on a map. It was violent, brutal, and deeply personal. Over 15 million people were forced to move, and over a million people died.
The Role of Britain
Britain played a significant role in the partition of India and the creation of Pakistan. They gave over 560 princely states like Kashmir a choice: join India, join Pakistan, or stay independent. The ruler of Kashmir, Maharaja Haris Singh, was a Hindu, but most of the people in Kashmir were Muslim. The Maharaja wanted to stay independent, not join either India or Pakistan. But in October 1947, tribal militias from Pakistan, backed by its army, launched an invasion into Kashmir to force it into Pakistan. In panic, the Maharaja turned to India for help. India agreed, but on one condition: Kashmir must officially become part of India. The Maharaja signed the instrument of accession legally joining Kashmir to India.
The First Indo-Pak War
Just like that, the first Indo-Pak war began. That war ended in 1948 with a ceasefire brokered by the United Nations, but the damage was done. Kashmir was now divided. India controlled about 2/3 of the region, and Pakistan controlled the rest, which it still holds today as Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The UN called for a referendum to let the people of Kashmir decide their future, but that vote never happened.
The Four Wars Between India and Pakistan
Since then, Kashmir has remained the bone of contention in every major conflict between the two nations. India and Pakistan have fought four wars in total: 1. 1947-48: The first war right after partition over Kashmir. 2. 1965: Another full-scale war again over Kashmir. 3. 1971: The most devastating war but this time not about Kashmir. It was about East Pakistan where India supported the independence movement that eventually created Bangladesh. 4. 1999: Kargil war Pakistani soldiers and militants disguised as locals infiltrated Indian territory in the Kargil region. India launched a massive counterattack operation and pushed them back.
The Use of Terrorism as a Weapon
In each of these wars, India emerged stronger militarily. But the cycle of hatred and mistrust never broke. And when war didn't work, Pakistan tried something else. By the early 2000s, a new kind of war had begun. A shadow war. Terrorism became the weapon of choice. It does seem like, I mean, again, this video could be biased, but from this, the way the video is prescribing this, it seems like Pakistan is the aggressor in every single one of these instances that they're the ones that are starting at every single one. The video could be biased. It's important to keep in mind quietly with backpacks, guns, and suicide vests, attacks on civilians became a tool to destabilize India, especially in Kashmir.
The Mumbai Attacks of 2008
One of the most horrific examples of terrorism in India was the Mumbai attacks of 2008. On the night of November 26th, 2008, 10 terrorists from Pakistan arrived by boat on the shores of Mumbai. Armed with AK-47s, grenades, and explosives, they split into teams and launched simultaneous attacks across the city. The Taj Mahal Hotel, the Oberoi Trident Hotel, Cafe Leopold, a Jewish community center, and Shivaji train station were all targeted. For nearly 60 hours, Mumbai turned into a war zone. More than 170 people died, including American, Israeli, and British citizens. Over 300 were injured. The only surviving attacker, Ajmal Kasab, was captured alive. His interrogation revealed detailed planning and training all traced back to Pakistan-based terrorist Lashkar-e-Taiba.
The Pulwama Attack of 2019
Then came Pulwama in 2019. A suicide bomber rammed a vehicle full of explosives into a convoy of Indian paramilitary forces. In Pulwama district, Kashmir, 40 soldiers were killed instantly. It was the deadliest attack on Indian security forces in decades. The terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed, based in Pakistan, claimed responsibility. India's response was swift and bold. In the early hours of February 26th, 2019, Indian Air Force jets crossed the border and bombed a terror training camp in Balakot, Pakistan. This was unprecedented. The first air strike on Pakistani soil since 1971. Pakistan responded by sending its own jets, leading to a short but intense dogfight. One Indian pilot, Abhinandan Varthaman, was captured but returned 2 days later as a peace gesture. The world watched nervously. Two nuclear-armed nations, one spark away from disaster. But the situation de-escalated.
The April 2025 Attack in Kashmir
Still, the attacks never fully stopped. Cross-border terrorism continued. Sleeper cells were busted. Indian security forces worked round the clock to prevent further strikes. But everything changed on April 22nd, 2025, with a horrifying attack in Bahalam, Kashmir. The scenic town of two weeks ago, nestled in the Kashmir valley, is known for its tranquil beauty, horse rides through pine forests, and peaceful rivers. Every year, it draws in thousands of tourists from across the country and abroad. But that day became a killing field. Tourists, like always, had arrived to enjoy the mountains. Vehicles can't go deep into the region, so most visitors hop on horseback and local guides to explore. Among them was a woman from central India, accompanied by her husband. Their horse guide chatted with them. But something about him was off. He wasn't just asking friendly touristy questions. He started probing. Where are you from? Have you read the Quran? Oh my god. Oh boy. Oh boy. Here it is. All right. Yeah. I I didn't see any of this at all. Are you Hindu or Muslim? The woman tried to brush it off, but then she heard him whisper on a call. Okay. Go with plan B. Guns are in place. Panic surged through her veins. She discreetly messaged India's intelligence team, a hotline most tourists wouldn't even know about. But before the agency could act, it was already around 6 to seven armed men dressed like locals suddenly appeared out of nowhere. Not military uniforms, civilian clothes, horses, and hidden weapons. But what they carried wasn't small arms. It was full-blown automatic weapons. They started pulling tourists off horses, shouting at them, "Are you Hindu or Muslim?" If Muslim, read the Quran. If not, they opened fire. Bullets flew in all directions. Screams echoed through the valley. The attackers didn't care if there were women, children, or elderly. Anyone who couldn't answer in the way they wanted was shot. 26 innocent tourists died on the spot. One woman lost her husband right in front of her eyes. Through tears, she shouted at the attackers, "You killed him. Kill me, too." But the response was chilling. One of the terrorists sneered and said, "No, go tell your prime minister what happened today." And then he laughed.
India's Response to the Attack
India's response to the attack was swift and decisive. The government launched a massive investigation to track down the perpetrators and bring them to justice. The army was put on high alert, and security was tightened across the country. India also began reviewing the Indus Waters Treaty and, in a bold but silent move, started diverting excess water that traditionally flowed into Pakistan. Not cutting off water but minimizing the outflow legally within treaty terms. It was a message. You keep sending terror, we'll stop sending rivers. In agriculture-dependent Pakistan, where 70% of the water comes from these rivers, this hit hard. The government issued press releases, held emergency meetings, and called it a violation. But legally, India hadn't broken anything. It had simply stopped playing nice.
The Escalation of Tensions
Meanwhile, back at the line of control, things got hotter. There were reports of drone intrusions, sniper activity, and unmanned surveillance aircrafts being taken down. But that wasn't all. For the first time in over a year, Indian Air Force fighter jets began routine patrols across northern air zones, especially near the borders. Troop movement increased. Tanks were spotted near forward bases. Special forces began training drills close to the border. This wasn't war, but it wasn't peace either. Pakistan, already reeling from an economic crisis, a falling currency, and skyrocketing inflation, suddenly had to prepare for something it wasn't ready for: escalation.
The Future of the Kashmir Conflict
At this moment, India hasn't launched a full-blown military strike. But the chessboard is set. Tensions are the highest they've been in years. Crazy that both of these countries have nukes, too, which is what's diplomats are working overtime. And across both countries, citizens are wondering, is this the start of something big? Well, I think it probably will be, honestly. It's uh it's true. It's an effective technique usually. Uh do you not even one prime minister in Pakistan's able to complete full term? They were always arrested by the military. Yeah. I mean, like that sounds pretty bad. I mean, the thing is whenever I look at the uh the video like this, it's very obvious to me that I mean, like I don't know. It seems like it was biased in favor of India and like it was pretty much one-dimensional but like some conflicts are like that right I mean it like there there's a good there's a good side and a bad side right uh I don't know whether that's true or not but like my skepticism you know like shield kind of goes up when I see that every single instance that's shown in the video is an instance of you know like one person being the aggressor and the other person not being. And this is just me coming at it from like a layman's perspective because I know that, you know, the way all media is, it can be deceptive. And so when I see something that's like trying to paint a very one-dimensional picture, I do begin being very skeptical because of that. Sadly, it's the case. Yeah. I just I'd need to know more about it before I was sure. And uh why is always Muslim countries ignoring the terrorist extremist groups though? I have no idea. Like I I'm not sure exactly like what they're what they're doing at all. I have no clue at all.
{# 
{# 
{# 
{# 
{#